Friday, July 1, 2011

Gardening in July

Friday, July 1

I kept to my course, gazing at everything along the way, from the recently opened pink and rose hollyhocks in front of our neighbor's peeling white shed, to the yellow Hyperion day lilies just beginning to open behind the currant bushes, to all the summery colors and shapes on display in Kate's perennial border, now at the climax of its third bloom phase. The tall fuchsia spikes of the lythrum, the sky blue of the stirrup-flowered delphiniums, the navy blue of the salvia spikes, the violet blue of the veronica spikes, the orange and pink and white of the tiger lilies, the yellow of the yarrow, the white of the small-petaled feverfew. So many colors and shapes so carefully arrayed from back to front, from one end to the other, I was momentarily transfixed by the spectacle.

Carl H. Klaus, My Vegetable Love: A Journal of the Growing Season

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Plant of the Week


Purple prairie clover
Petalostemum purpureum (Vent.) Rybd.
scientific name, 2008: Dalea purpurea Vent.
other common names: thimbleweed, red tassel flower


White prairie clover
Petalostemum candidum (Willd.) Michx.
scientific name, 2008: Dalea candida Michx. ex Willd.
other common names: thimbleweed, white tassel flower
Petalostemum: from the Greek, meaning “petal and stamen,” referring to the way the petals and stamens are joined
Purpureum: meaning “purple”
Candidum: meaning “shining white”
Legume family: Fabaceae (Leguminosae)
Photo: Dalea purpurea


Photograph by Thomas Rosburg, Wildflowers of the Tallgrass Prairie: The Upper Midwest, Second Edition


Monday, June 27, 2011

Interview with Peter van der Linden and Donald Farrar Part 2

When did you begin writing the first edition of this classic book? How did you divide the labor?
Peter: I wrote the text as a graduate student at Iowa State in the late 1970s. The academic year was organized into quarters then, and I alternated between teaching and research. I taught botany labs in the fall and spring quarters, working on the book during the evenings. In the summer and winter I worked on the book full time. I tried to write one species account every day. That included the research necessary to complete the descriptions and text.

Don: A few decades ago, Peter, as a beginning graduate student, came into my office at Iowa State as a rare commodity—a student who knew exactly what he wanted to do for his MS thesis. It would be a book on the trees of Iowa, the best ever written, and that is what he did! Peter was in charge of all of it, including obtaining funding and working with ISU Press. I just read the manuscript and made suggestions. For the second edition, while Peter was employed at the Morton Arboretum, I added a little more on forest ecology, including a number of text photos of Iowa tree communities. Upon Peter’s return to Iowa, as director of the Iowa Lakeside Laboratory, the University of Iowa Press extended the opportunity for us to work together again. For the third edition, Peter concentrated on the text revision and I on the new color images.

Keys can be daunting, but you have managed to create keys that are as user-friendly as possible. How did you do this?
Peter: You are right, keys are a challenge. By the time you become expert enough to prepare one, you can recognize small differences between species that are not obvious to everyone else. So you include those obscure characters in the key, and people who use it say “huh?” What helped me most, I think, was that I was teaching young people who had no previous experience in plant identification, and I could see the trees as they see them.

Don: During the course of the book’s development, we built on knowledge gained through teaching dendrology. Later I could tell my dendrology students that the book’s keys were the best keys ever written…because they had written them. There was a lot of truth in this because their repeated testing of the early versions of the keys revealed many characteristics that didn’t work, as well as some that worked better. The terms and monikers they came up with for new characteristics were often humorous, but invariably they were based on real characteristics that we were able to incorporate into the keys. It’s easy to construct a key that works in your mind, but one that works for others is another matter. Without question, it is the multiple testing by thousands of students over the years that is a primary reason why these keys are superior.

Do you have favorite trees or families of trees?
Peter: I have always been partial to oaks, but no particular species stands out. They’re all great trees.

If I had to pick an individual species of tree, I would probably choose the eastern white pine. The Lake Superior Highlands are my favorite place in all the world, and the white pines are a characteristic part of the forest there. I love how they stand so tall above everything else, and how the wind sounds in their foliage.

Another favorite is the three-flower maple, a beautiful small tree from eastern Asia that is hard to find but very nice for landscaping. I have planted one at every house where we have lived.

Then there are the tulip tree, katsura, and ginkgo…so many wonderful trees. How do you choose one?

Don: My favorite tree is the white oak, because of a very special white oak. In the mid 1880s, my great grandfather purchased the land in southeastern Missouri where I grew up. My grandfather cleared a site in the virgin forest to build my family’s home. As a little boy, I explored the giant stumps left under the house. My grandfather also left a few trees for shade—two huge black oaks in the front yard that survived into the 1940s and a white oak in the back yard that looms especially large (as it was) in my memories. That old white oak sheltered us from generations of summer suns and was the site for picnics, watermelon feasts, and the making of home-made ice cream. It was the site for work projects and innumerable games. Its trunk supported our basketball hoop and served as backboard! I recall, in the fall, the thumps on the roof of its large acorns—just the right size for little hands to gather and throw. Though hollow at the time of my earliest recollection, the old white oak of my childhood still stands, more majestic than ever, its giant spreading limbs still sheltering the home it has always been part of.

How did you become interested in trees in the first place? And what other species interest you?
Peter: My dad was a journalist but very interested in trees. One day we were driving down the highway on a family vacation, and Dad pointed to a tree about a hundred yards away, and said, “Look at that beautiful elm.” I thought he was joking…how could you identify a tree from so far away, moving so fast? It intrigued me and I started looking at trees more closely. I must have had a genetic predisposition to liking trees; something just clicked.

Don: Growing up on an Ozark farm in the 1940s, I had no choice but to be interested in trees. Electricity had not yet come to that part of the country, and propane or natural gas was also not available. We heated our house and cooked by wood-burning stoves. Through one of my early chores of splitting kindling wood for the cook stove, I quickly learned to identify which kinds split most easily and to select these from the wood pile by their bark. Later, as I helped my father select trees from our woods for felling and preparing for various uses, I learned which were best for firewood, fence posts, and telephone poles and which could be sold for stave bolts or used for construction lumber. Our telephone system was a local co-op for which all members had to supply poles. I learned to cut, debark, and cure telephone poles, choosing the species that would last the longest.

My dad was an excellent woodsman. I remember how surprised I was at his knowledge when in college, working on an oak identification project, I found a species new to me, chinkapin oak, Quercus muehlenbergii. I couldn’t wait to tell my dad about it. His reply—“yep, there’s one of them down there in the thicket.”

Coming to Iowa State, I did not expect to be teaching dendrology for 36 years. But, as often happened at that time, the new hire was expected to teach all the courses taught by the professor he replaced, even though he may not have been informed about what those were going to be. Looking back, inheriting dendrology this way was a most fortunate accident. I loved teaching tree identification and forest biology to the future caretakers of our forests. It is a special pleasure now to see so many of those students currently employed in influential positions in Iowa and around the country.

Where should we go to see a variety of trees, something more interesting than the lindens and maples that line the streets in our community?
Peter: Arboretums are the best places, really, because the trees are accessible and usually labeled. A new chapter in the third edition describes several of those, plus a few state parks and other places people can go. Some readers may question why our list isn’t more complete, but it isn’t meant to be exhaustive, just a few places Don and I recommend. We included a broad geographical representation so people in all parts of the state can see a variety of trees without traveling far.

Peter van der Linden and Donald Farrar, Forest and Shade Trees of Iowa


Friday, June 24, 2011

June Gardening Tip


Once you have good-sized green tomatoes, you can hasten ripening by pruning some of the plants roots. Simply take a spade and plunge it into the soil on one side of the tomato plant, four or five inches away from the main stem.

Veronica Lorson Fowler with the Federated Garden Clubs of Iowa, Gardening in Iowa and Surrounding Areas

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

This Week in Iowa Nature

June 21 - 22: Summer solstice. Look in ponds for painted turtles basking on logs in the sun.

Jean C. Prior and James Sandrock, The Iowa Nature Calendar

Plant of the Week


Tall cinquefoil
Potentilla arguta Pursh
scientific name, 2008: Drymocallis arguta (Pursh) Rydb.
other common names: five-finger, glandular cinquefoil, white cinquefoil
Potentilla: from Latin, a diminutive form of “powerful,” probably applied because of the significant medical powers once attributed to another species of this genus
Arguta: from Latin, meaning “sharp,” referring to the sharp teeth of the leaf margins
Rose family: Rosaceae

Photograph by Thomas Rosburg, Wildflowers of the Tallgrass Prairie: The Upper Midwest, Second Edition

Monday, June 20, 2011

Interview with Peter van der Linden and Donald Farrar Part 1

This edition of Forest and Shade Trees of Iowa has all-new color photos that are amazingly detailed, almost three-dimensional. Tell us how you accomplished this.
Don: Digital imagery has revolutionized the production of biological images. More than 10,000 photos were saved for this project. This number doesn’t include many, many more that were immediately discarded as “not in the running” for the final selections. These are numbers that would be prohibitive for film photography. A further advantage of digital photography is the depth-of-field that is easily obtainable without cumbersome equipment or a photographic studio. Macrolens capability and a dedicated flash that senses the correct amount of light are all that is required for stunning close-ups. Digital images are also more adaptable to cleaning and alteration of backgrounds to display the subjects more clearly.

This having been said, it is also important to know the subject and the most important characteristics to emphasize. For example, to identify red maple vs. silver maple at flowering time, it is important to show the tiny red petals that are present in red maple but absent in silver maple flowers. To display these differences, the flowers are best photographed from a particular angle at just the right stage of development.

About 10 years ago, the late Anna Gardner and I discovered the utility of flatbed scans for botanical images. Anna prepared full sets of these for the nearly 200 species of trees the students in our dendrology class were required to know. We were amazed at the popularity and effectiveness of these images. The clarity and lifelike three-dimensionality were amazing, and the close-up scans of buds and leaf scars allowed students to see these useful characteristics as never before. This became the inspiration for the species plates in Forest and Shade Trees of Iowa.

Accumulating the images for the book was a three-year project. The first 80 percent was easy; the remainder was more challenging than I ever anticipated. Finding a perfect leaf is relatively easy, but try finding a branch with no leaves ravaged by insects, wind, diseases, or other trauma. Most fun were the fruits, because of their menagerie of colors and textures and the fact that most remain in good condition over a fairly long period of time. Twigs, buds, and leaf scars proved more challenging than one might think. To be useful for winter identification, they must appear in the book as they do in winter, thus necessitating collection after all the leaves have fallen naturally, i.e., in winter.

The most challenging were flowers—they have to be found and photographed during the short time of their appearance. Tree flowers, more often than not, are pretty inconspicuous. I was already familiar with the flowers of most species, but for a few, I came to realize that I had never seen flowers and had no clue as to when the trees bloomed. The sycamore, Platanus occidentalis, for example, necessitated periodic visits to trees that I knew had produced fruits the previous season. After a few weeks, when I finally found sycamore flowers, I was delighted at the beauty of the tiny balls studded with forked red stigmas. A special challenge was the hedge apple, Maclura pomifera. Not only did I not know when it bloomed or what the flowers would look like, I also didn’t know where to find mature trees that I could be sure would flower. I finally found appropriately large trees in Red Rock State Park but had to continue to visit them until very late spring in order to photograph mature flowers. I now know that this species is among the latest of all Iowa trees to bloom.

How did you decide which species to include?
Peter: Actually, this was the most difficult task we faced in preparing the first edition. We decided early on to include all Iowa’s native trees, but there was no complete list of those, so I had to prepare one. Some of those are rare and obscure, so we had to figure out how to cover them in the book; we didn’t think mountain maple deserved the same treatment as sugar maple, for example. Selecting the introduced species proved to be an even greater challenge. They range from species you see on almost every corner, to species you might find once or twice in an entire town, to species you almost never see. I knew that whatever we decided to include, someone would say, “Why isn’t so-and-so in the book?”

The decision was easier in the third edition. We covered everything from the first two editions plus some additional introduced species. Still, I am sure there will be readers who question why we included or excluded a particular species or didn’t give more coverage to their favorite trees.

Don: There is not much of a secret here. We wanted to include all the species that readers are likely to see in Iowa, both native and introduced. Experienced readers will see that we didn’t quite accomplish this due to the large number of introduced trees in arboretum and similar plantings. A few native species also are not included because of the difficulty of their identification to species. We included some species that might more properly be called shrubs, but can be confused with young trees, and some that are especially important in landscaping.
We have not included full descriptions of a number of species that are found just over the border in adjacent states to Iowa’s north and south, but many of these are included in the discussions of similar Iowa trees. With these few exceptions, Forest and Shade Trees of Iowa should be usable in adjacent parts of all neighboring states.

What’s different about the organization of this edition compared to the first two editions?
Peter: Users of the first two editions will be surprised at how different this edition is. The format of those editions was a bit rigid, with only one page for each species, regardless of the tree’s importance. That limited how much we could write about the natural history, culture, and uses of the trees, and for some species we wanted to write more.

We solved this problem in the third edition by separating the descriptive information from the text. The photographs and descriptions come first, and only the most common species are covered in that part. In the following part, we discuss those species plus many others, with the amount of text varying from species to species depending on their ecological and economic importance in Iowa.

In the first two editions, species were arranged in an esoteric taxonomic sequence that was once followed in most botany books but is now outdated and rarely used. In the third edition, the descriptive information is organized by similarities in foliage. The text is arranged alphabetically by botanic name.

Don: The basic information about trees and the keys haven’t changed much from the earlier editions, and I would be embarrassed if they did. The organization has changed a lot. Peter has completely rewritten the text in a user-friendly style, and we have reorganized the parts to make identification faster and easier. A major change is the full-color images of the trees and their parts. These are crisp images of real plants made possible by digital photography and by the use of computer scanning. Through the latter it is possible to “flatten” branches into entirely “in-focus” images while still retaining a three-dimensional appearance. Flowers are now included for nearly all species. Although flowers are not necessary for most tree identifications, they provide fuller insight into the species’ biology, and, although often tiny, they can be surprisingly beautiful. Finally, the University of Iowa Press has done a wonderful job of combining everything into a very attractive, user-friendly format.


Peter van der Linden and Donald Farrar, Forest and Shade Trees of Iowa